Recently
RSS has become the "in thing" and an example of the
Web 2.0 craze. Many webmasters are adding RSS feeds to their sites
because of this. When an RSS feed is added to a site, the RSS (
)
icon is used so that it is globally recognised. Alternatively, the feed
(
)
icon is used to link to RSS or Atom feeds.
This would be alright if only these 2 icons were used, but
many webmasters thought "RSS is XML so lets use an XML logo". They
preceded to place an XML (
)
logo on their websites. The are a few problems with this:
)
logo and not the RSS (
)
icon or the feed (
)
icon. Why should the user be expected to recognise all three images?If you do have a feed on your website, please use the RSS (
)
icon or the feed (
)
icon.
For those people who are still unsure of which is which, Wikipedia defines RSS with the following statement:
and also says that:
On a separate page, Wikipedia defines XML as the following:
Tags: Atom, Feed, Image, Logo, Miscellaneous, Rss, Web 2, Wikipedia, Xml
Related Items:
This website follows the ideas of the No Nofollow, I Follow, DoFollow, No-NoFollow movement. Leave a helpful comment and you will get a link without NoFollow (U Comment, I Follow).
If you are looking for web hosting then I would recommend my current web host. They have been good to me, suiting both beginners and advanced users.
Using a transparent and trusted advertising network always helps to generate more revenue on a website. One of the networks I use achieves this more than the others.
If you would like to help pay the web hosting bill for this site, you can donate through my host
If you are looking for web hosting then I would recommend my current web host. They have been good to me, suiting both beginners and advanced users.
Using a transparent and trusted advertising network always helps to generate more revenue on a website. One of the networks I use achieves this more than the others.
If you would like to help pay the web hosting bill for this site, you can donate through my host